<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blank browser windows for Photoshop mockups</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dave-woods.co.uk/index.php/blank-browser-windows-for-photoshop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dave-woods.co.uk/index.php/blank-browser-windows-for-photoshop/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:27:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Miguel</title>
		<link>http://www.dave-woods.co.uk/index.php/blank-browser-windows-for-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-28442</link>
		<dc:creator>Miguel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dave-woods.co.uk/?p=701#comment-28442</guid>
		<description>Hi

May be this service will be useful http://www.browsercover.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi</p>
<p>May be this service will be useful <a href="http://www.browsercover.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.browsercover.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Woods</title>
		<link>http://www.dave-woods.co.uk/index.php/blank-browser-windows-for-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-28378</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Woods</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dave-woods.co.uk/?p=701#comment-28378</guid>
		<description>I agree, for simple or minimilistic designs then I&#039;d probably jump into a browser after working on paper but for complex designs then I&#039;d want to work in Photoshop first.

For really complex web apps though, I might jump in a browser first just to create a wireframe so that the client can see how the forms click through from one to the next and once they&#039;re happy with that use Photoshop to create the design elements which once approved can easily be applied to the wireframe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, for simple or minimilistic designs then I&#8217;d probably jump into a browser after working on paper but for complex designs then I&#8217;d want to work in Photoshop first.</p>
<p>For really complex web apps though, I might jump in a browser first just to create a wireframe so that the client can see how the forms click through from one to the next and once they&#8217;re happy with that use Photoshop to create the design elements which once approved can easily be applied to the wireframe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johny Favourite</title>
		<link>http://www.dave-woods.co.uk/index.php/blank-browser-windows-for-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-28377</link>
		<dc:creator>Johny Favourite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dave-woods.co.uk/?p=701#comment-28377</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got to admin I used to do everything in Photoshop first and I agree it has it&#039;s benefits. Then certain people mentioned about designing in the browser and I could never imagine it.

However my Blog has been designed in this way. Well paper first for general element placement/wireframing and then in to the browser. I then know that the layout looks fine with just text. 

I guess it all boils down to the customer in the end. I like mininal style as you can see from my dj site. That isn&#039;t always going to be the best way to go for all clients.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got to admin I used to do everything in Photoshop first and I agree it has it&#8217;s benefits. Then certain people mentioned about designing in the browser and I could never imagine it.</p>
<p>However my Blog has been designed in this way. Well paper first for general element placement/wireframing and then in to the browser. I then know that the layout looks fine with just text. </p>
<p>I guess it all boils down to the customer in the end. I like mininal style as you can see from my dj site. That isn&#8217;t always going to be the best way to go for all clients.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Woods</title>
		<link>http://www.dave-woods.co.uk/index.php/blank-browser-windows-for-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-28375</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Woods</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dave-woods.co.uk/?p=701#comment-28375</guid>
		<description>Yeah I&#039;ve seen people that work like that but for quite graphic heavy designs or for complex user interfaces then I still find it best to mock them up in Photoshop first :)

(I&#039;m also looking at putting together a collection of browser elements, input fields, checkboxes, radio buttons etc in Photoshop format so it&#039;s easier to create mockups)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I&#8217;ve seen people that work like that but for quite graphic heavy designs or for complex user interfaces then I still find it best to mock them up in Photoshop first <img src='http://www.dave-woods.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>(I&#8217;m also looking at putting together a collection of browser elements, input fields, checkboxes, radio buttons etc in Photoshop format so it&#8217;s easier to create mockups)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johny Favourite</title>
		<link>http://www.dave-woods.co.uk/index.php/blank-browser-windows-for-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-28374</link>
		<dc:creator>Johny Favourite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dave-woods.co.uk/?p=701#comment-28374</guid>
		<description>Or you could just design in the browser in the first place? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or you could just design in the browser in the first place? <img src='http://www.dave-woods.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
