<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quick tip: CSS link ordering</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dave-woods.co.uk/index.php/quick-tip-css-link/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dave-woods.co.uk/index.php/quick-tip-css-link/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 15:57:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.dave-woods.co.uk/index.php/quick-tip-css-link/comment-page-1/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 08:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dave-woods.co.uk/?p=56#comment-86</guid>
		<description>John, that&#039;s true if you&#039;re going to change the order but if you want to combine the styles and keep them in the same order then you shouldn&#039;t have any problems using the comma as far as I&#039;m aware.

I would usually declare them all separately though apart from the a, a:link values.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, that&#8217;s true if you&#8217;re going to change the order but if you want to combine the styles and keep them in the same order then you shouldn&#8217;t have any problems using the comma as far as I&#8217;m aware.</p>
<p>I would usually declare them all separately though apart from the a, a:link values.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Porter</title>
		<link>http://www.dave-woods.co.uk/index.php/quick-tip-css-link/comment-page-1/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>John Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 23:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dave-woods.co.uk/?p=56#comment-84</guid>
		<description>I found that even if you want to apply the same styles to two of the link types (i.e. a:link, a:hover), it is still better to do them all separately and not use the comma separator. Some browsers can mash this up and your styles will not be effective.

Good piece of advice, I will also emphasize this with you...

&lt;b&gt;This is not a tip, it is a must!&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found that even if you want to apply the same styles to two of the link types (i.e. a:link, a:hover), it is still better to do them all separately and not use the comma separator. Some browsers can mash this up and your styles will not be effective.</p>
<p>Good piece of advice, I will also emphasize this with you&#8230;</p>
<p><b>This is not a tip, it is a must!</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CSS TIP: ORDEM DE DECLARA&#199;&#195;O DOS LINKS &#187; Pinceladas da Web - Reflex&#245;es sobre XHTML, CSS, PHP e WebStandards</title>
		<link>http://www.dave-woods.co.uk/index.php/quick-tip-css-link/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>CSS TIP: ORDEM DE DECLARA&#199;&#195;O DOS LINKS &#187; Pinceladas da Web - Reflex&#245;es sobre XHTML, CSS, PHP e WebStandards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 14:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dave-woods.co.uk/?p=56#comment-71</guid>
		<description>[...] tempo que quero falar sobre isso aqui no blog, mas hoje, vendo os meus Feeds, acabei achando uma refer&#234;ncia legal que me fez criar coragem e escrever sobre o assunto. Quando vamos declarar no CSS os links, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tempo que quero falar sobre isso aqui no blog, mas hoje, vendo os meus Feeds, acabei achando uma refer&ecirc;ncia legal que me fez criar coragem e escrever sobre o assunto. Quando vamos declarar no CSS os links, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.dave-woods.co.uk/index.php/quick-tip-css-link/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 07:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dave-woods.co.uk/?p=56#comment-19</guid>
		<description>The order should be like this due to link specificity. For example, moving the a, or a:link to the end of the CSS would stop the active and visited from working due to them being superseded by the a and a:link styles.

Using CSS in this correct order will ensure that all the styles applied to each state will be rendered correctly.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The order should be like this due to link specificity. For example, moving the a, or a:link to the end of the CSS would stop the active and visited from working due to them being superseded by the a and a:link styles.</p>
<p>Using CSS in this correct order will ensure that all the styles applied to each state will be rendered correctly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Zemens</title>
		<link>http://www.dave-woods.co.uk/index.php/quick-tip-css-link/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>David Zemens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dave-woods.co.uk/?p=56#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Great tip, Dave. I was aware of this, but wonder if you can shed some light on why the order needs to be so?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great tip, Dave. I was aware of this, but wonder if you can shed some light on why the order needs to be so?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

